| Creators: |
Shokrizadeharani, Leila and Batooli, Zahra and Heydarian, Saeedeh and Sharif, Reihane and Ghaderkhany, Shady and Tamehbidgoli, Maryam and Ataiejahanbegloo, Fatemehzahra and Hieber, Daniel and Kuhn, Peter |
| Abstract (ENG): |
An essential aspect of cancer registration is data quality. Data quality for Cancer Registries has been reviewed in this paper using four main criteria (comparability, validity, timeliness, and completeness). Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant English articles published from inception until December 2022. Each study was analyzed for its characteristics, measurement method, and data quality features. According to the present study, the majority of articles evaluated the completeness feature, and the fewest evaluated the timeliness feature. A completeness rate of 36% to 99.3% and a timeliness rate of 9% to 98.5% were observed. Standardizing metrics and reporting of data quality is necessary to maintain confidence in the usefulness of cancer registries. |
| Citation: |
Shokrizadeharani, Leila and Batooli, Zahra and Heydarian, Saeedeh and Sharif, Reihane and Ghaderkhany, Shady and Tamehbidgoli, Maryam and Ataiejahanbegloo, Fatemehzahra and Hieber, Daniel and Kuhn, Peter
(2023)
Evaluation of Completeness, Comparability, Validity, and Timeliness in Cancer Registries : A Scoping Review.
In: (Proceedings of the) 21st International Conference on Informatics, Management, and Technology in Healthcare (ICIMTH), July, 1-3, 2023, Athens, Greece, pp. 160-163.
(Studies in Health Technology and Informatics; 305).
ISBN 9781643684017
|
